Instead of the commenter at the beginning of the article cheering on the establishment of a charter school that would cater to ADHD and dyslexic kids, shouldn't the writer question the whole concept of inclusion in the public schools?
After all, establishing a public charter school dealing with special ed kids flies in the face of inclusion.
So shouldn't inclusion of kids who actually need more individualized instruction be curtailed in the public schools?
I happen to believe so, but inclusion does save money, which, of course, is the whole point of it.
Featured Post
The View from Grizzly Peak
Today I went on a group hike through the Medford Parks and Recreation Department to Grizzly Peak, which is located in the Cascade-Siskiyou M...
-
On a somewhat off track, Sovereignty has won the 151st Kentucky Derby for Godolphin Stable. Journalism, the favorite, came in second, whi... -
Journalism has won the 150th Preakness Stakes. It was an extremely tight far turn into homestretch. I am happy nobody was hurt, but I thin... -
Early today marked the passing of 1950s French icon Brigitte Bardot, who was 91 years old and had mostly been out of the limelight since ret...
No comments:
Post a Comment