Here we get another inflammatory article about how it is these lazy, veteran teachers need to go in budgetary times and keep these young, "innovative" teachers on the payroll.
There is a reason for "senority rules," especially in public education. It's to protect those who are older, more experienced, who however may not be the preference of the idiot principals. Besides, if these principals hired these "ineffective" teachers in the first place, how they can be entrusted with laying them off?
What abolishing seniority rules is about is age discrimination and saving a few bucks by hiring or keeping on the "20/20" or "two-fer" teachers: twenty-somethings at 20K a year (or a little bit higher given inflation), or two cheapo bimbos for the price of one experienced, older teacher.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
A Slap on the Wrist
Today, I read the news that a convicted killer who got a slap on the wrist, had once been married to Andy Williams, had a mediocre singing ...
-
Golden Tempo has won the 152nd Kentucky Derby. Jose Ortiz is the jockey. It is his first Derby win. This race is historic, for the fir...
-
Napoleon Solo has won the 151st Preakness Stakes at Laurel Park. Iron Honor tried to make a bid at the homestretch, he couldn't quite c...
-
Early today marked the passing of 1950s French icon Brigitte Bardot, who was 91 years old and had mostly been out of the limelight since ret...
No comments:
Post a Comment