The most difficult aspect of the double bind is that it is invisible; we think we are just reacting to the candidates as individuals. Yet even the words we use to talk about women, as compared to men, come drenched in gender. This is as true for journalists as for voters in conversation. For example, joining a chorus of praise for Clinton’s performance in the first Democratic debate, New York Times columnist Frank Bruni used words that undercut her authority. He began by characterizing her as a “seamstress” because she “threaded the needle as delicately and perfectly as a politician could.” Sewing clothes and threading a needle require skill and dexterity, but the metaphor feminizes—and trivializes—the tasks for which these skills are suited. Bruni ended by calling Clinton a “sorceress” because she came across as forward-looking and energetic despite her “many decades in the political trenches.” The word “sorceress” not only diminishes with its –ess ending (would you entrust your life to a doctoress?), but also evokes a long history of demonizing (literally) powerful women as witches._____
Sunday Reads
Sexism is actually at the root of why some people "distrust" and "dislike" Hillary Clinton:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
The End of an Era
Two days ago, Annette Dionne, the last of the world-famous Dionne quintuplets, the first quints born who all survived and, I believe the ON...
-
On a somewhat off track, Sovereignty has won the 151st Kentucky Derby for Godolphin Stable. Journalism, the favorite, came in second, whi...
-
Journalism has won the 150th Preakness Stakes. It was an extremely tight far turn into homestretch. I am happy nobody was hurt, but I thin...
-
Early today marked the passing of 1950s French icon Brigitte Bardot, who was 91 years old and had mostly been out of the limelight since ret...
No comments:
Post a Comment