But you will get these cultural relativist idiots claim there should be no restrictions on this fucking child abuse against young girls.
_____
The superintendent's heart is in the right place, but what she did are firing offenses, and, in a state like Oregon, subject to license sanctions.
Story is here.
Also here.
The issue is this:
"The other side of it is you have a school superintendent who is demonstrating through her actions that its O.K. to be dishonest and falsify your name," Cummings said. "That was more troubling. I think she realizes that."
Educators are ALWAYS held to a higher standard. ALWAYS.
She should be fired for it.
_____
What do you expect? Men in dresses are hogging up more and more of women's bathroom spaces.
And no, men in dresses are not being assaulted in men's bathrooms. That is a lie; however, these dudes are assaulting, raping, and even murdering women in their protected spaces.
A woman should have written the article and not a dude.
_____
2 comments:
It’s a bit peculiar that a school superintendent would adopt this means of dealing with a student’s illness, esp. given that there were many students living under poverty conditions. I can see a young idealist teacher, most likely female, considering the possibility of pulling this off, but an experienced administrator? Maybe she had just read a critical piece about “professional detachment.”
I don't get this story, either. It makes no sense. Every educator knows he or she has to respect boundaries. The superintendent could have have pointed the relative to services that would help poor people. Furthermore, you would think that under Obamacare or Medicaid, this student would have been helped. Certainly the relative should have been contacted immediately and taken to the hospital to fill out the necessary paperwork. Really and truly, as much as people want to lavish praise on this woman, she committed offenses that should have been gotten her fired and her license sanctioned.
Post a Comment