Reproductive Prostitution Is NOT Okay

Just as there is no "right" to sex, so there is no "right" to parenthood.  Kids aren't something to check off on a bucket list, for crying out loud.  There are enough children in the world who are abused and unwanted.  Nobody has any business going out and buying a woman's body, thus risking her life and health, to satisfy the person's selfish desire to be a parent.

The "G" in the LGBT+ movement is especially demanding they have a "right" to a woman's body without any of the ickiness (in their eyes) that having sex and a relationship with a woman involves.  They just want the kids in order to "prove" something.  They want to be just like those shitbags Elton John and Anderson Cooper, who exploited women to get what they want.  It is despicable.  I know there are more than a few gay men out there who thoroughly hate women.  They would have to to think they have some "right" to buy a woman's body for their use, just like men buy women and girls for "sex"--abuse.

Yet, these perpetual cries for victimhood and change are a bizarre but effective mechanism that really only the LGBTQ community gets away with frequently. I might want to be a size four but I’m not going to start a campaign against thin models demanding they pay for me to look like them. Still, the LGBTQ community believes it’s unfair that women have a uterus. They believe that those uteruses are theirs by right, for sale or rent, and that they should be able to pay women to grow babies in their uterus for them and then sever all ties to the women who nourished the baby-commodity in her belly with her own body, thereby erasing women yet again.

This trafficking in women's bodies needs to be illegal across the board, worldwide.

Nobody gets everything they want in life. People who for whatever reason can't have children need to accept it and move on.

Scumbag of the Year

Anderson Cooper displays entitlement and complete lack of self-awareness of what he has done when he "proudly" announced yesterday he was a first-time daddy to help carry on the family name.  What a piece of sociopathic shit:




Self-centered, entitled jerk. He deserves even more harsh language than this. THIS is the truth of what Anderson Cooper is. No, he couldn't go and adopt a child already born into the world. I would have supported his decision if he had. However, he didn't do that. His ego about "carrying on the family name" was way more important than anything else. To hell with the baby, to hell with the MOTHER of that baby, denigrated as a "surrogate," which she is no such thing. Furthermore, he felt had to go out and exploit a poor woman (or women, if there was an "egg donor" involved) by using her as a reproductive prostitute. Got news for Anderson Cooper: A woman is not a thing, a body, for men like you to use. Gay men, like all men, are not entitled to use of women's bodies. Women are not things to be bought and sold. Only men who HATE women do things like this. Only sociopaths do this. Cooper is in fact a john for all intents and purposes. There is also NO right to having children. I hope the MOTHER of that baby ends up suing this piece of human garbage for custody. THAT would be justice. Cooper proves by exploiting poor women he is an unfit parent. Anybody who thinks what he did is okay is an idiot.

Anderson Cooper is an Exploiting Piece of Shit

There is NO other way to see this.  An innocent baby is taken from a mother because this asshole decided to pay her to risk her life and health for his selfish ends.  While everybody is talking about how "wonderful" it is, the fact is Anderson Cooper is no different than a john buying a prostitute.  He is a sociopath, like all men who buy women and girls.

There is nothing that makes me madder than the notion by entitled men like Cooper think they have a right to not only dehumanize women, but treat them like they are nothing but incubators and fuck toys; in his case, just as an incubator.  I hope the "surrogate"--the MOTHER of this baby--ends up suing this bastard for custody.

He and most of the morons who support him think he will be a great father; however, to do this to a woman, likely a poor woman, is the very definition of unfitness for parenthood.

Cooper can go to hell.

Cooper, who is gay, said in his on-air announcement that "I never thought it would be possible to have a child, and I am so grateful for all those who have paved the way, and for the doctors and nurses and everyone involved in my son's birth."

"Most of all," he said, "I am eternally grateful to a remarkable surrogate who carried Wyatt, watched over him lovingly, tenderly, and gave birth to him."

What a goddamned worthless son of a bitch. He never thought of actually adopting a baby, no. He had to exploit a poor woman, a desperate woman, to go through the risk of a pregnancy in order to satisfy his monstrous ego. He has to dehumanize her as well as being a mere incubator and childbearer.  Clue to Cooper:  She is not a "surrogate," you asshole.  She is the child's MOTHER.

And idiot politicians like Andrew Cuomo think legalizing this bullshit is all hunky-dory.

Cooper is nothing but a goddamned john exploiting women.  He is another gay man who despises women.

Reproductive Prostitution

This is as good a reason as any why I would never, ever support a presidential run by Andrew Cuomo.  Dipshit doesn't understand having children is not a right, and furthermore, women aren't things to fuck and pop out children for asshole, wealthy men and yes, in the case of "surrogacy," even women .  He signed into law a commodification of women's bodies.  This is heinous beyond belief.  Cuomo is a stupid fuck once again, bringing disgrace on the family name.

Supporters of this crime against women and children often bitch about the religious right's opposition to abortion, but in all honesty, they are two sides of the same fucked-up coin.  I don't care if gay men can't have "their own children."  Too bad; you can't always get everything you want.  You can, in fact adopt children.  Some avail themselves to turkey basters so they don't have to "touch" women they are not attracted to.  However, paying poor women and forcing them to give up their rights to the children they risk their lives and health for is the mark of sociopathic behavior.

These women are NOT "gestational carriers."  They are pregnant women who become MOTHERS.

The dehumanizing of half the human race is SOP with the queer theory crowd.  Nothing new here.

It Should Die a Quick Death

"Surrogacy" is reproductive prostitution, and therefore it is a human rights abuse.  Nobody is entitled to have a child.  That is just the way it is, and people who think they have a right to exploit others in this manner are unfit by definition to be parents.

link

Andrew Cuomo is an idiot to think this is okay.  Why is it that men think women are just things to be bought and sold?

"Surrogacy is a complicated issue," the National Organization for Women said. "Altruistic surrogacy should be legal and accessible in every state, but commercial surrogacy will do great harm to women, especially those in vulnerable populations."

Paulin said the opposition from some women's organizations and advocates, including Gloria Steinem, was a factor in the bill's demise.

"They raised some concerns that members wanted addressed," Paulin said.

"I think we had the time to address most of that, but not all of it. I have confidence that we will be able to address all of those concerns, but we’re so close to the end now that I don’t think it’s going to happen in the short-term.”

It is inherently exploitative. Poor women are not things to be used by wealthy couples, either straight or gay. Too bad, so sad, but parenthood is not a "right."

Cuomo and other "Democrats" are a disgrace to the Democratic Party in their support for the trafficking of poor women.

Human Rights Abuse is an Outrage

That is what so-called surrogacy is. Using women's bodies because somebody wants a child is the same goddamned thing as prostitution. It should be illegal everywhere. You are not owed a child just because you want one.

Most people cheering this shit on have never thought the issue through. I don't give a shit if it is two gay men--women are not body parts to be used. It is like they never, ever thought of the consequences of their actions not only on the baby, but also on the mother--the woman who went through pregnancy and giving birth.

This Never Should Have Been Allowed

I know so-called "surrogacy" has been legal for years and is fairly common, but as far as I am concerned it is another form of prostitution, what with it exploiting desperate women so some well-to-do couples can have their "own" children. At least more or less their "own."

Can you imagine a kid growing up in this kind of situation and finding out in adulthood that he or she has been brought up in a twisted, perverted arrangement? At least with adoption it can be explained, but how in the hell can you explain exploiting a kid's birth mother and paying her for the "service"?

Worse still is the risk for custody battles between the birth mother and the couple.

It should never have been allowed in the first place, but this is what happens when you have this "libertarian" nonsense seeping into public policy.

Good southern Oregon has joined the movement of exploiting women for profit.

This is distinctly sick.

Miscellaneous News

A recent lawsuit involving a reproductive prostitution business (called "surrogacy," but let's call it by its right name) illustrates the lack of regulations in this exploitative industry.

Since I Am Opposed

to surrogacy for the same reason I am opposed to legalized prostitution, I am not grieving over such exploitative businesses suffering during this economic downturn.

There is always adoption for couples who want children albeit not "perfect" kids.