Somebody Over at DU

linked this Ted Rall piece about Howard Dean and what I think is his strange support from liberals.

A snip:

"Dean's supporters don't believe what they're told. They hear what they want to believe, and Dean provides the strident vagaries that fuel their self-delusion. 'We need to know what the president knew and when he knew it,' he spat when Bush got caught lying about Iraq weapons of mass destruction in his State of the Union address. That reference to the 1974 Nixon impeachment hearings affirmed many Democrats' belief that Bush deserves serious punishment for lying about Iraq, but will President Dean turn over Bush to the International War Crimes Tribunal? Not bloody likely. And how can antiwar types reconcile Dean's support of Bush's invasion of Afghanistan?"

These flip-flops and inconsistencies are what are going to be Dean's undoing.