Of course it wasn't there because the Edwards trial wasn't about any evidence at all. It was a means to shame him to marginalize him from politics for good and at the same time tarnish the Democratic Party name.
Not that the party label hasn't already been tarnished by Obama's destructive neoliberal policies.
Three of the Edwards trial jurors spoke about the case. Incredibly, two of them thought he was "guilty" of something.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
The End of an Era
Two days ago, Annette Dionne, the last of the world-famous Dionne quintuplets, the first quints born who all survived and, I believe the ON...
-
On a somewhat off track, Sovereignty has won the 151st Kentucky Derby for Godolphin Stable. Journalism, the favorite, came in second, whi...
-
Journalism has won the 150th Preakness Stakes. It was an extremely tight far turn into homestretch. I am happy nobody was hurt, but I thin...
-
Why should women's rights even be a subject for debate? To even suggest there is a debate about it is proof sexism is alive and well a...
No comments:
Post a Comment