that explains why single-parent families, let alone single adults without kids, fare much more poorly economically than those comfortable married couples who could wind up in the exact same situation given the worsening economy. Two incomes provide a higher standard of living than one. It ain't rocket science.
The article is pure idiocy. Most single-parent households are as a result of divorce or a spouse having died, not because of women "choosing" to be single and having children alone. Yes, it is true the Times and other media often glorify women who "choose" to be single mothers, as long as they have glamorous careers (and typically a trust fund to fall back on). That may encourage less well-off, young women to go it alone when they shouldn't, but shaming these women for a shitty economy is not the way to go.
By the way, those in the article who brag about their luxurious lifestyles being married could well find themselves in the same situation the way this country is headed. It doesn't take much for the house of cards to collapse on top of them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
The End of an Era
Two days ago, Annette Dionne, the last of the world-famous Dionne quintuplets, the first quints born who all survived and, I believe the ON...
-
On a somewhat off track, Sovereignty has won the 151st Kentucky Derby for Godolphin Stable. Journalism, the favorite, came in second, whi...
-
Journalism has won the 150th Preakness Stakes. It was an extremely tight far turn into homestretch. I am happy nobody was hurt, but I thin...
-
Why should women's rights even be a subject for debate? To even suggest there is a debate about it is proof sexism is alive and well a...
No comments:
Post a Comment