They already have both Oregon senators and my GOP representative in their corrupt pocket, but they still want me to mail a bunch of cards in support of their bullshit Equality Act which includes the non-existent but sex-erasing "gender identity":
I mailed letters out to these people previously, and it didn't do one damned bit of good. They are all in the pocket of Trans Inc.
This little sticky note is a classic case in projection, complete with the "right side of history" bullshit that craps all over the rights of half the human race, women:
But look what my money would do to help them if I would only part with a mere twenty bucks or more:
Interesting they talk about "gender" (read "sex") stereotyping. The trans are all about stereotypes to the point of mocking women and claiming they ARE women.
And if I send $35 or more, look what I will get:
Instead, I will just consign this nonsense into the trash where it belongs.
2 comments:
When Gay Marriage was still controversial, I was intrigued by the idea of Civil Unions becoming the counterpart to Marriage. I find it interesting that there are allegedly 50 or 60 or 70 different types of gender identities, but there could only be ONE for marriage.
The reality is, a heterosexual couple that can reproduce have a heavier burden to bear because pregnancy can occur when it's least expected or planned for. Whereas a Gay couple can CHOOSE when to have a pregnancy.
So while Marriages clearly do not all fit into one bundle, it has now become ok to say there are dozens of different kinds of gender identities.
Getting back to Civil Unions, I always thought that sounded so much more graceful than Marriage and over time I could see Civil Unions as becoming more popular than Marriage. Instead, just as Civil Unions were growing in popularity, Gay Marriage took over and we lost Civil Unions.
I guess Heterosexuals must share Marriage whether they like it or not and even when Civil Unions would have one day been the most common form of Marriage, but Gender Identity can have dozens of versions.
The world didn't come to an end with same-sex marriage. Marriage rates are still on the decline, birthrates are tumbling.
T and Q are totally different kettles of fish and why I am against what they are trying to do. In reality, the Ts in particular completely negate what the LGBs are because the latter are based on the reality of sex in order to have sexual orientation. The Ts are all about the queer theory/postmodernist dogma of whatever I say I am, I am. Never mind sex is not an identity but a material fact. That is why the Equality Act needs to be purged of the "gender identity" nonsense. It destroys the rights of women to separate spaces and sports. There are logical reasons for those protections and rights, just as there are protections for age, for disability, for race.
Post a Comment