Why Trump Will Win Re-election

The article could be titled, "Why Trump Will Win Re-election," and he won't need to ask for help from Putin.

Unbelievable any politician would go down that road to sacrifice women and girls' safety rights, privacy, and sports over something that really does not exist but gives carte blanche to sexual predation by  unstable and violent males.  "Gender identity" does not in fact exist at all.  There is crossdressing and transvestism.  There are mental disorders of being dissatisfied with one's own body to the point of physical harm.  Those are real.  "Gender identity" is not.  It was coined by Dr. John Money of Reimer twins infamy, which should discredit the concept right then and there, assuming anybody can define what it is.

The proposal to include "gender identity" in federal law is a direct assault on women's sex-based protections they spent decades trying to achieve.  It is saying to women they have no inherent right to public space free from male sexual violence, voyeurism, harassment, and all the rest so many men do.  There is no way women can differentiate between the "good" crossdressing men from the "bad" ones.  They are all men, no matter what they call themselves, and men are the sex that engages in sexual predation.  "Not all men" but enough of them that public safety requires that ALL of them be barred from women's sex-based places.  It is a liability issue.  This "transgenderism" nonsense never should have gotten as far as it has, but there is a ton of money behind it, through deviant billionaires like Pritzker and the spectacularly whacko "Martine" Rothblatt, to the more insidious pharmaceutical and medical establishment that disregards the Hippocratic Oath for profit peddling medical quackery.

"Gender identity" and "transgenderism" cannot be protected categories.  They just can't because they don't exist.  Nobody "identifies" as a sex role, which "gender" refers to.  Nobody "identifies" as a sex--one just is either male or female, and sex can never, ever, ever be changed or altered.  By claiming they do they obliterate sex as a protected characteristic, and it also undermines the rights of LGB people because transgenderism, taking its cue from the poisonous "queer theory," claims sex does not exist as a material fact.  If sex does not exist, then sexual orientation cannot exist.

"Transgenderism" is all about destroying the rights of protected classes of people to benefit what is largely a white male movement.   It destroys affirmation action benefiting women and girls and essentially tries to force women and girls out of public life.   It is a wealthy white male movement of frankly deviant males.  The women who are sucked into this cult are not the ones who pose a danger to others.  It is males, for obvious reasons.

The Democratic Party, which really doesn't understand the issue at all, is being sucked into this cult thinking that fake men and fake women are the opposite sex of their real sex and that they deserve special protections which require the destruction of protections other people need.  The fact is there are no rights they don't already have.  They just can't shit on the rights of women as it is now.  The only area the trans have possible standing at all for protections is in the very narrow area of dress codes.  That is it.  After all, they are all about crossdressing and role-playing.  The rest of their demands crap all over the rights of others.  It is not acceptable, and, once the public understands the issue, there is utterly no support whatsoever for it outside of their tiny bubble.

I don't think there is a single candidate running for the Democratic Party nomination who isn't in the tank for Pritzker and the rest of them.  I think they are mostly sincere, mistakenly thinking, like so many people do, that "transgenders" are just another form of gay.  They are a totally different kettle of fish altogether, but these people don't know that.  These politicians don't know that.  These politicians know little or nothing of the poisonous "queer theory" that is infecting college campuses around the country and that is the philosophy underlying the trans movement. If there is a single candidate in the Democratic Party who doesn't support this, he or she is keeping quiet for fear of death threats.  This is another reason why you can't give these men--and it isn't the women who are making death threats--special protections.  They are unstable by definition.

By ignorantly supporting this movement, the Democratic Party, indeed the American left, is signing its own death warrant.  The right has filled in the void left by a party that should put women (and LGBs) in the forefront of support.  Everything is being turned on its head because we know the right doesn't care about women and girls, either, as they actually are aligned with the trans notion that sex roles are innate, which is anti-woman.  All the "left" does is try to shut concerned women up by saying to be against the Equality Act's inclusion of "gender identity" is to support white supremacy, right-wingers, and so on. One could easily turn the tables and say to support "gender identity" is to support the "rights" of sexual deviants, perverts and pedophiles, and outright criminals.

I can't think of any Democratic candidate I want to get behind next year.  Maybe Joe Biden, but the rest I am just not impressed with.  This goes way beyond the Equality Act, which not only will never become law as long as it includes "gender identity," but it is almost certain the concept of "gender identity" superseding sex will be tossed out by the USSC.